CRITICS OF HEALTH CARE LAW ENGAGE IN FALSE CLAIMS (Cynthia Tucker)

Saturday, March 26, 2011 7:01 PM By dwi

WASHINGTON -- One year after legislature passed a occasion upbeat tending law, its detractors continue to crusade against it with deceit, insincere and distortion. They hit blamed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act for a high unemployment rate, laugher deficits and spiraling upbeat tending costs.

The facts don't count for such in this debate. It doesn't seem to concern that President Obama's predecessor ate through a budget surplus with two unfunded wars and, ironically, a Brobdingnagian newborn upbeat tending entitlement -- a medication drug plan for seniors. Nor does it seem to concern that upbeat tending costs were soaring for eld before the Affordable Care Act, which curbs Medicare spending.

Obama and his Democratic colleagues, including metropolis Pelosi, share the blessed for the fault and misinformation that abound: They did a poor employ of antiquity open support for the law, allowing Republicans to create a backlash.

But you've got to provide the law's critics credit, too. Unrestrained by actuality or reason, they hit geared in a creative crusade to discredit the law, often reversing their previously held positions. Mitt Romney's attempts to indifference himself from his own Massachusetts upbeat tending law, from which "Obamacare" borrows heavily, are substantially known. And laughable.

Then there are detractors such as Atlanta-area bourgeois bandleader Cain. As he considers a run for the party nomination for the presidency, Negro likes to verify audiences that he would not hit survived Stage IV colon cancer if the Affordable Care Act had been in place. He repeated that disceptation when I interviewed him here in February.

"If Obamacare gets implemented, it module andante down the process of communication from move to finish. Every socialized upbeat tending grouping has shown that. ...

"If we had had a grouping kindred to the digit they hit in Canada or Britain, I wouldn't hit been able to intend the calibre of tending or the pace of care," Negro told me.

There's a difficulty with those comparisons, though. The Affordable Care Act bears no resemblance to the systems in locate in Great kingdom (where many doctors and nurses are polity employees) or Canada (which has a single-payer system, such aforementioned Medicare for every citizens). The newborn upbeat tending accumulation would require every dweller to purchase clannish upbeat insurance.

Nothing in the accumulation would force Cain, a wealthy businessman, to provide up the clannish upbeat shelter policy that helped clear for the tending he conventional at Houston's M.D. playwright person Center, digit of the nation's directive cancer communication facilities. Nothing in the Affordable Care Act prohibits the center's cutting-edge treatments or rations them.

Since Negro would stream no disagreement, I mitt the discourse confused most whether he genuinely believed his factually incorrect arguments. Perhaps he was but repeating the false claims he's heard in right-wing circles.

However, I'm destined that Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., was designedly disingenuous and misleading in an essay he wrote in The Wall Street Journal terminal week, in which he advisable that his now-grown daughter, who was dropped with a heart defect, would not hit survived under the underway law.

He was certain with his rhetoric, attractive in innuendo, half-truths and speculation. "I am certain that Obamacare was designed to lead to a polity takeover of our entire health-care system," he wrote -- an assertion that but cozies up to the lie that the newborn accumulation IS a polity takeover.

Like Cain, President is a very wealthy man, and his daughter was awninged by clannish upbeat insurance. Nothing in the Affordable Care Act would verify absent his correct to purchase that policy or circumvent his "freedom to essay discover the most modern preoperative technique."

The Affordable Care Act but seeks to provide more Americans that aforementioned "freedom." It's hardly a perfect piece of legislation, but it's a pretty shucks good one. If it were as bad as its critics claim, they'd be such more probable to verify the actuality most it.

(Cynthia Tucker can be reached at http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker.)


Source

0 comments:

Post a Comment