Anti-abortion plans pose dilemma for Republicans (AP)

Saturday, March 5, 2011 5:01 PM By dwi

WASHINGTON – Restrict failure or cut spending? The Republicans' "Pledge for America" says the newborn majority module do both. But negotiations over the federal budget threaten to obligate the GOP, including its 87 House freshmen, to opt between them.

It's a warning in congressional reality that has Republicans struggling with how to balloting — and what to do — when a divided polity pits dedication against pledge.

"That's a difficulty - and I mean, a actual problem," said river Rep. Jim Jordan, chair of the standpat politico Study Committee's budget and outlay duty force.

How would he balloting on a budget that cuts outlay but lacks the promised failure restrictions? river winces.

"We haven't seen the finished product," he said.

The House terminal period passed its edition of the budget that would money the polity finished September. The manoeuvre would cut outlay by $61 billion and prohibit federal dollars from feat to Planned Parenthood as daylong as the methodicalness performs abortions. It also reinstates restrictions, lifted by President Barack Obama, on polity money for some methodicalness that assets abortions in foreign countries.

The failure restrictions hit nearly no quantity of existence included in the outlay plan that the Democrat-dominated senate ultimately passes. That could be weeks from today despite a March 18 deadline that carries with it the danger of a coloured polity shutdown.

A compromise that could transfer both the House and senate module include at small a good assets of the cuts that now-GOP freshmen promised during the crusade and feature their constituents loudly demand. Slashing federal spending, they insist, is their No. 1 priority.

Restricting federal money for failure providers comes a close second or third, as such a part of the GOP's crusade "Pledge" as outlay cuts and repealing Obama's upbeat tending overhaul.

The newborn politico majority has finished plenty of fighting for what they promised, but getting their wish list finished the entire legislature is a tougher task. The upbeat tending accumulation cancellation unsuccessful in the Senate. The House's budget received a thorough scoffing from senate Democratic body and Obama said he would oppose it.

House Republicans feature just having their debate terminal period went a daylong artefact toward satisfying their crusade promises.

In an emotive overnight session on the underway year's budget, the House voted 240-185 to block federal dollars from feat to Planned Parenthood.

There was more.

The outlay bill, before some amendments, reinstated a prohibition on federal money for some methodicalness that uses its own assets for abortions performed in foreign countries. Obama lifted the restrictions in 2009.

Under underway law, federal dollars may not be utilised for abortions eliminate in the cases of rape, incest or when the chronicle of the care is in danger.

Pro-choice lawmakers and groups said the politico efforts on failure amount to an move on women and family-planning services. Democrats attain the housing that patch Planned Parenthood performs abortions, the assemble uses federal money on upbeat services for women who can't give it some other way.

Planned Parenthood has undertaken a alarming lobbying crusade to kick out the restrictions from the senate bill.

Watching the negotiations from the House, some ethnic conservatives were uneasy modify conversation most how they would balloting should a newborn negotiated budget transfer the senate and become to the House without the anti-abortion provisions.

If they balloting against the newborn version, they also would feature no to outlay cuts they demanded.

If they balloting for it, they would ditch, for now, the party's anti-abortion promises.

Rep. Chris Smith, perhaps the House's most fervently anti-abortion member, said he'd balloting against some budget that doesn't "preserve life." Blocking money for Planned Parenthood also cuts spending, said Smith, R-N.J.

"There's no think to be divided. These are twin objectives," adventurer said, predicting many politico freshmen opposed to failure module balloting with him.

Freshman Rep. David Schweikert, R-Ariz., isn't digit of them. He opposes abortion. But he said he'd balloting for a budget that lacks newborn restrictions on the machine because underway accumulation already bans federal dollars from existence utilised for most abortions. Banning taxpayer dollars from feat to Planned Parenthood, he said, should be a battle for added period if it comes to a choice.

"If we're staying with that underway policy, I think we'd still be safe," Schweikert said. "Because for me, it's substantially most the fiscal position" he took in terminal year's elections when it came to reining in the federal deficit.


Source

0 comments:

Post a Comment